Sacramento Family Sues After Child Born With Brain Injury, Part 1 of 6
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this birth injury/personal injury case and its proceedings.)
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories, and for Monetary Sanctions
This is an action for medical negligence arising out of the birth of the minor plaintiff, John Smith, at University Hospital in Sacramento in April 2000 which resulted in severe neurologic injury to the minor. Plaintiffs allege that defendant University Medical Center ("University") and others carelessly and negligently managed the medical care of plaintiffs including but not limited to delivery and post-delivery care of minor plaintiff John Smith. As a result of defendant's negligence John Smith suffered severe brain injury, paresis and other neurological damage, resulting in impairment of mental and bodily function.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs served their first set of Special Interrogatories on defendant University on February 28, 2002. University requested four extensions of time to respond to the interrogatories, all of which were granted by plaintiffs. After having an extended six weeks to answer, University served written responses on May 16, 2002. Defendant responded to Special Interrogatory, Numbers One through Seven, with an inadequate boiler plate objection, stating that defendant did not have to produce the information because it was equally available to plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs' counsel attempted to meet and confer with University with regard to their deficient responses to the special interrogatories by letter dated May 31, 2002. In their meet and confer correspondence, plaintiffs' counsel outlined each alleged insufficient interrogatory response, the answer given by University as well as the reason the answer was inadequate, and an explanation as to why the information requested in the interrogatories was relevant.
In essence, the first seven special interrogatories propounded by plaintiff requested the names and identifications of witnesses, known to defendant, who were present during the birth of the minor plaintiff and who may have observed the events surrounding the birth. (See Part 2 of 6.)
For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins.